I built a pricing page in Lovable that adapts based on who’s visiting.
A few examples:
→ Returning user? The messaging shifts.
→ Power user? Upgrade nudges appear.
→ Admin? Team features get emphasized.
→ Startup founder? A time-sensitive offer shows up.
These small changes are easy to miss but I truly believe they make a big difference. When your interface responds to context, it feels more relevant.
And relevance drives conversion.
If you have read my recent post about dynamic design, you know what I am talking about.
The whole idea is moving away from static layouts and shifting towards dynamic systems.
If you want to try it yourself, here’s the exact prompt I used in Lovable:
Prompt:
Build a high-end pricing page with modern design and dynamic logic.
Visual style:
Clean, minimal, Stripe-level polish. White space, soft shadows, elegant font. Responsive.Structure:
Header with product name + value prop
Pricing toggle (Monthly / Yearly)
3 plans: Starter, Growth, Pro
Feature comparison
Sticky CTA
Add a floating "Scenario Switcher" with these options:
→ New visitor
→ Returning user
→ Power user (85% quota used)
→ Admin
→ Startup on free planLogic per scenario:
New visitor: “Get started for free”, no nudges
Returning user: Header changes, Growth plan gets subtle animation
Power user: Highlight Pro plan, message: “You’re close to hitting your limit”
Admin: CTA becomes “Invite your team”, team features emphasized
Startup: Show banner: “3 months free if you upgrade this week”
Smooth transitions, fade-ins, context-aware buttons.
Use atomic components and link behavior with dynamic logic.
And here’s the Lovable project I created: View now
That's not dynamic. That's user-controlled.
I’m struggling to understand what’s meant by “dynamic design” here. In the example, users are asked to self-select a category to view a different pricing UI—but that feels more like segmentation than design dynamism.
From a UX perspective, this approach raises red flags:
Why force users to declare “who they are” upfront? On a pricing page (generally a website), most users are either new or returning visitors.
Where does this flow sit in the broader journey? Is this acquisition, conversion, or retention? Without that context, it’s hard to judge whether this interaction helps or hinders.
It feels less like a dynamic design solution and more like a messaging test wrapped in a UI prompt.